U.S. Army Lt. Gen. Douglas LuteThe Washington Post

Bush Taps Skeptic of Buildup as ‘War Czar’
Lt. Gen. Lute Accepts Position Others Spurned

President Bush tapped Army Lt. Gen. Douglas E. Lute yesterday to serve as a new White House “war czar” overseeing the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, choosing a low-key soldier who privately expressed skepticism about sending more troops to Iraq during last winter’s strategy review.

In the newly created position, Lute will coordinate often disjointed military and civilian operations and manage the Washington side of the same troop increase he resisted before Bush announced the plan in January. Bush hopes an empowered aide working in the White House and answering directly to him will be able to cut through bureaucracy that has hindered efforts in Iraq.

I don’t know. This seems like just another layer of bureaucracy. Plus, this Lt. Gen. Lute’s war experience is in the Gulf War of 1991. That was a very different war than the one our guys are fighting now.

It concerns me that Lute is talking about political solutions and concerns about the perception of ‘occupation’ created by having Westerners in the Middle East. That sounds to me like he’s more concerned with the Iraqis than he is our Soldiers.

I’m still looking for someone who is concerned for the American military men and women. I’m tired of people willing to put the word of our enemy before the word of our Soldiers. I’m also tired of our Soldiers being put in harms way without the full backing of the American military.

Other people are commenting on this new appointment ….

Jules Crittenden

As usual, unfortunately, the Bush administration comes up with a bright idea too late and too light. The three-star designated to oversee operations and give orders to the Pentagon and State Department must first be confirmed before, as ABC puts it, he can “assume the position.”

Outside the Beltway

I expressed dubiousness about the whole idea of a war czar when it was first floated and the appointment of a 3-star who is currently running operations for the Joint Staff doesn’t win me over.

Hot Air says the WaPo article unfairly leads to the impression that was against the surge by quoting only part of a two-year old quote.

Captain’s Quarters says this is a strange organizational chart and someone is going to have to explain how it’s going to work. He goes on to give a good, well thought out plausible reason for creating this new layer of bureaucracy.